The U.S. Copyright Office earlier announcedAn investigation report, believes that at present, artificial intelligence technology is generating digital content at an increasingly faster speed, while the sophistication and scale of generation are growing more and more significantly. The government should formulate new laws to regulate it, otherwise it will cause greater impact.
In the relevant assessment of the U.S. Copyright Office, it was pointed out that the current laws cannot solve the problems caused by digital copying of content, and even raise the impact level to the state level. The federal laws currently adopted in the United States have made it difficult to limit the impact of such problems.
The report also recommends that the US government develop security clauses, including recommending that service providers provide rapid deletion of unauthorized digital copies. It also calls for respecting everyone's right to control the legal use of their portraits. It also believes that the harm caused by the misuse of portraits is not limited to celebrities, but ordinary people will also suffer. It emphasizes that the right to portrait rights does not only apply to specific people, but also covers a wide range of individuals.
This report is just one of many investigations conducted by the U.S. Copyright Office on the application of artificial intelligence technology. It also shows that there are actually more issues that need to be explored in the development of artificial intelligence technology applications, and current laws may need to be adjusted with the times.
recentlyMany artificial intelligence technologies have developedThere are many controversies over whether content distributed on online platforms can be legally used for AI training. Many website operators believe that even if the content is made public online, it is still protected by copyright, so AI companies should not access and use it at will. However, some AI companies believe that quoting is allowed under reasonable circumstances, and more people express that they do not want their personal portraits and published content to be used for AI training.
